Correct Answer: learner centered instruction costs the school district more in the cost of curriculum, specialized activities for the students, etc. the question asks to identify which excuse is not commonly given for hesitating to switch to a learner-centered classroom. the options provided suggest various reasons that might be argued against adopting learner-centered methods.
the first excuse, "direct methods, that have been used for years, have always been successful for most students in achieving the standards required by law," is indeed a commonly cited reason. many educators feel comfortable with traditional, teacher-directed methods that have historically met educational benchmarks and might be reluctant to change to approaches that seem less proven or predictable.
the next excuse, "learner-centered instruction costs the school district more in the cost of curriculum, specialized activities for the students, etc.," is actually not typically a valid excuse. contrary to this claim, learner-centered education often does not require significantly more financial resources. instead, it requires a shift in teaching approach and possibly more creativity in lesson planning. the repeated expense-related excuse listed in the question is a misconception and is the answer to the question as it is not usually given as a genuine reason for hesitancy.
the third excuse, "learner-centered classrooms are chaotic, loud, and unmanaged, with little regards to study and learning of the materials," is a misconception but still a frequently cited concern. some educators unfamiliar with learner-centered methods may perceive these classrooms as disorderly because they are more dynamic and involve higher levels of student engagement and interaction than traditional setups. however, this does not mean they lack structure or effective learning.
the last excuse, "teachers are not being trained in using learner-centered strategies, most teachers are not educated on using these methods," is a genuine concern and often cited. many teachers may not have received training in learner-centered techniques, making them hesitant to implement these strategies due to a lack of confidence or understanding of how to manage such a classroom effectively.
to summarize, the excuse that "learner-centered instruction costs the school district more in the cost of curriculum, specialized activities for the students, etc." is not typically a valid or commonly given reason against adopting learner-centered methods. this misconception may stem from a misunderstanding of what learner-centered education involves - creativity and flexibility in teaching rather than additional financial investment in resources.
|