This is the content of the pop-over!



OAE Professional Knowledge: Multi-Age (PK-12) (004) Practice Tests & Test Prep by Exam Edge - Topics


Get Instant Online Access Now!

** Sample images, content may not apply to your exam **

Understanding what is on the OAE Professional Knowledge: Multi-Age (PK-12) exam is crucial step in preparing for the exam. You will need to have an understanding of the testing domain (topics covered) to be sure you are studing the correct information.

  • Directs your study efforts toward the most relevant areas.
  • Ensures efficient and adequate preparation.
  • Helps identify strengths and weaknesses.
  • Allows for a focused approach to address gaps in understanding.
  • Aligns your preparation with the exam's expectations.
  • Increases the likelihood of success.
  • Keeps you informed about your field's current demands and standards.
There is no doubt that this is a strategic step in achieving certification and advancing your career.

Select Your Test Bundle

Excellent

  

Select Quantity

Buy one or SAVE BIG with a Multi Test Value Pack for the OAE Professional Knowledge: Multi-Age (PK-12) exam.

Bonus: 100 free flashcards for OAE Assessment of Professional Knowledge: Multi-Age (PK-12) with purchase of at least 10 practice tests!
All transactions
secured and encrypted
All prices are
in US dollars
Get 10% OFF today's order using promo code SAVE-GYUY Ends in    


OAE Professional Knowledge: Multi-Age (PK-12) (004) Shortcuts

Additional test information
General Exam Info
Exam Topics
Exam Topics
Features
Features
Study Plan
Study Plan Tips
Exam Edge Desc
Test Reviews
Why Exam
Why Exam Edge?
Exam FAQ
FAQ
Exam FAQ
Take a FREE Test


Understanding the exact breakdown of the OAE Assessment of Professional Knowledge: Multi-Age (PK-12) test will help you know what to expect and how to most effectively prepare. The OAE Assessment of Professional Knowledge: Multi-Age (PK-12) has 100 multiple-choice questions and 2 essay questions. The exam will be broken down into the sections below:

OAE Assessment of Professional Knowledge: Multi-Age (PK-12) Exam Blueprint
Domain Name % Number of
Questions
Student Development and Learning 24% 24
Assessment, Instruction, and the Learning Environment 50% 50
The Professional Environment 26% 26


OAE Assessment of Professional Knowledge: Multi-Age (PK-12) - Exam Topics Sample Questions

A class has completed a unit test. When should the teacher return the test to provide the best feedback?





Correct Answer:
return tests at the beginning of class.
the question of when to return a test to provide the best feedback is crucial in the educational process. effective feedback is a cornerstone of good teaching, directly affecting students' learning and understanding. this decision should be informed by strategies that prioritize timely, accurate, and constructive feedback. let's explore why returning tests at the beginning of class is often considered the most effective timing.

returning tests at the beginning of class allows students to immediately engage with their performance while the content is still fresh in their minds. this timing ensures that the feedback they receive is relevant and can be acted upon promptly. if students receive their results too late, the details of the test and their preparation may no longer be clear, reducing the impact of the feedback.

moreover, returning tests at the start of class sets the tone for that session. it signals a focus on reflection and learning from one’s mistakes, which is essential for academic growth. students have the opportunity to review their answers, understand where they went wrong, and ask clarifying questions. this direct interaction with their own results, aided by immediate teacher input, enhances their learning experience.

additionally, discussing test outcomes at the beginning allows the teacher to address common errors or misconceptions observed across the class. this can be done through a group discussion or a review session, turning individual feedback into a learning experience for the whole class. it also encourages a culture of openness about mistakes, emphasizing that errors are opportunities for learning rather than just failures.

this strategy also aligns with the principles of peer and self-assessment. by reviewing their tests at the start, students can compare their understanding and evaluations with those of their peers in a structured manner, fostering a collaborative learning environment. they learn not only to assess their own work critically but also to appreciate diverse approaches and solutions to the same problem.

in contrast, returning tests at the end of class or during individual meetings might not provide these collective learning opportunities and could delay the feedback loop. while individual meetings offer personalized feedback, they lack the immediacy and group learning benefits of class discussions. moreover, waiting until the end of class might make students anxious and distract them from the day’s lessons, thereby diminishing the educational efficacy of the feedback process.

in conclusion, returning tests at the beginning of class is generally the most beneficial approach. it ensures timely and relevant feedback, promotes an educational dialogue between the teacher and students, and leverages peer interactions for enhanced learning. this method supports the educational goals of helping students use assessments to guide their learning effectively and develop a deeper understanding of the subject matter.

Content validity is not easily established in which type of assessment?





Correct Answer:
portfolio.
**content validity** refers to the extent to which a test measures the entire range of the subject matter or behaviors it is supposed to measure. it essentially scrutinizes whether an assessment correlates well with the various elements within a specific domain it is intended to assess. this form of validity is critical for ensuring that an assessment tool is adequately comprehensive and representative of the content it aims to evaluate.

in the context of different types of assessments such as multiple-choice tests, true/false questions, matching items, and portfolios, establishing content validity varies in complexity and effectiveness.

*multiple-choice tests, true/false questions, and matching items** are examples of traditional assessments. these types of assessments are structured and limited to specific, predetermined responses. establishing content validity in these assessments can be relatively straightforward because the test developer can systematically ensure that each item aligns with specific elements of the curriculum or subject matter. for instance, in a multiple-choice test, the creator can design questions that cover different topics or skills proportionally to their importance in the course material.

*portfolios**, on the other hand, represent a form of authentic assessment. a portfolio is a compilation of work that a student has created over a period of time, which may include various forms of work such as writings, drawings, projects, etc. this type of assessment is intended to provide a more comprehensive and practical demonstration of a student's abilities and knowledge across a range of activities and contexts.

however, establishing content validity in portfolios can be particularly challenging. this difficulty arises because portfolios are highly individualized and can vary significantly from one student to another. each portfolio depends on the student's choice of content, the projects or tasks they engage in, and the personal emphasis they place on different areas of learning. as a result, it becomes hard to ensure that a portfolio, as a whole, comprehensively covers the domain of interest uniformly or systematically as traditional tests might.

moreover, the subjective nature of evaluating a portfolio further complicates the establishment of content validity. evaluators might have different interpretations of the quality and relevance of the work presented, and unlike standardized tests, scoring can be influenced by subjective judgments about creativity, effort, and presentation styles.

in conclusion, while portfolios offer a rich, nuanced, and practical insight into a student’s capabilities, their diverse and personalized content makes it difficult to uniformly apply and ascertain content validity. in comparison, traditional assessments like multiple-choice or matching tests allow for more controlled content representation, making the process of establishing content validity clearer and more systematic.