This is the content of the pop-over!



AEPA Special Education Learning Disability (27) Practice Tests & Test Prep by Exam Edge - Topics


Get Instant Online Access Now!

** Sample images, content may not apply to your exam **

Understanding what is on the AEPA Special Education Learning Disability exam is crucial step in preparing for the exam. You will need to have an understanding of the testing domain (topics covered) to be sure you are studing the correct information.

  • Directs your study efforts toward the most relevant areas.
  • Ensures efficient and adequate preparation.
  • Helps identify strengths and weaknesses.
  • Allows for a focused approach to address gaps in understanding.
  • Aligns your preparation with the exam's expectations.
  • Increases the likelihood of success.
  • Keeps you informed about your field's current demands and standards.
There is no doubt that this is a strategic step in achieving certification and advancing your career.

Select Your Test Bundle

Excellent

  

Select Quantity

Buy one or SAVE BIG with a Multi Test Value Pack for the AEPA Special Education Learning Disability exam.

Bonus: 100 free flashcards for AEPA Special Education Learning Disability with purchase of at least 10 practice tests!
All transactions
secured and encrypted
All prices are
in US dollars
Get 10% OFF today's order using promo code SAVE-GYUY Ends in    


AEPA Special Education Learning Disability (27) Shortcuts

Additional test information
General Exam Info
Exam Topics
Exam Topics
Features
Features
Study Plan
Study Plan Tips
Exam Edge Desc
Test Reviews
Why Exam
Why Exam Edge?
Exam FAQ
FAQ
Exam FAQ
Take a FREE Test


Understanding the exact breakdown of the AEPA Special Education Learning Disability test will help you know what to expect and how to most effectively prepare. The AEPA Special Education Learning Disability has multiple-choice questions The exam will be broken down into the sections below:

AEPA Special Education Learning Disability Exam Blueprint
Domain Name % Number of
Questions
Understanding Students with Specific Learning Disabilities 19% 19
Assessing Students and Developing Individualized
Education Programs (IEPs)
19% 19
Promoting Student Development and Learning 48% 47
Working in a Collaborative Learning Community 16% 16


AEPA Special Education Learning Disability - Exam Topics Sample Questions

If a school wants to end a child's special education, what should they use to notify the parents?





Correct Answer:
written notice.
when a school decides to end a child's special education services, it is mandatory to provide the parents with a written notice. this formal notification is crucial as it serves several important purposes:

**legal compliance:** under the individuals with disabilities education act (idea), schools are required to inform parents of any changes in their child's educational placement or the provision of special education and related services. this written notice ensures that the school complies with the law by documenting the decision to end special education services.

**clarity and documentation:** written communication helps prevent misunderstandings or miscommunications that can occur with verbal notifications. it provides a clear, unambiguous record of the school's decision and the reasons behind it. this is important for maintaining transparency between the school and the family.

**parental rights:** the notice informs parents about their rights to challenge the school’s decision. under idea, parents have the right to dispute the decision through due process if they believe it is not in the best interest of their child. the written notice should include information on how they can request a due process hearing or other forms of dispute resolution.

**detailed explanation:** in the written notice, the school must outline the specific reasons why it believes the child should no longer receive special education services. this may include details about assessments, evaluations, and the data used to make this decision. providing this detailed explanation helps parents understand the rationale behind the decision and whether they might want to seek further evaluations or second opinions.

**opportunity for collaboration:** by receiving this notice, parents are given the opportunity to engage in meaningful dialogue with the school about their child's education. they can discuss the decision, provide additional input, and explore other possible educational supports or interventions that might benefit their child. in conclusion, if a school wishes to end a child's special education program, it must provide the parents with a written notice. this procedure not only fulfills legal requirements but also supports clear communication, safeguards parental rights, and contributes to the collaborative process that is essential for the effective education of children with disabilities.

What does NOT measure a child's performance in assessing IEP effectiveness?





Correct Answer:
teacher observations.


the question pertains to identifying which methods do not appropriately measure a child's performance when assessing the effectiveness of an individualized education program (iep). an iep is a plan or program developed to ensure that a child who has a disability identified under the law and is attending an elementary or secondary educational institution receives specialized instruction and related services.

achievement tests, percentile rankings, and grade equivalent scores are all formal assessments. these tools are designed to measure a student's knowledge or proficiency in a particular area of learning compared to a norm group or across time. they are considered objective measures as they provide quantifiable data that can be consistently interpreted, regardless of who administers or evaluates the test.

teacher observations, on the other hand, involve the subjective evaluation of a student by their teacher, based on day-to-day interactions and performance in the classroom. while teacher observations can provide valuable insights into a student's behaviors, social integration, and daily performance, they are considered subjective because they can vary significantly between observers. different teachers may have different perceptions and judgments, which can lead to inconsistencies in how student abilities and improvements are evaluated.

the legal standpoint often favors more quantifiable and standardized methods to assess iep effectiveness. courts have supported this view by ruling that teacher observations, due to their subjective nature, do not provide a reliable and objective measure of a student's performance in the context of assessing iep success. this legal perspective underscores the necessity for objective assessments in making determinations about the adequacy and effectiveness of an iep.

therefore, in the context of the question, teacher observations are not considered a reliable measure for assessing iep effectiveness due to their subjective nature, which is susceptible to personal bias and variability among educators. in contrast, formal assessments like achievement tests, percentile rankings, and grade equivalent scores offer a more standardized and legally defensible approach to evaluating the success of an iep.