This is the content of the pop-over!
  
Exam Edge Dark Logo Exam Edge Dark Logo
Business
Healthcare
Education
World


Recent Searches
Try searching for

DHA Radiotherapy Technologist (DHA-RAD) Practice Exams & Test Prep - Review


Get Instant Online Access Now!

** Sample images, content may not apply to your exam **


Passing your DHA Radiotherapy Technologist can be a very stressful time in your life. So why take chances with your preparation? Let us help you through the certification process. See why so many users choose ExamEdge.com to guide them through the process. We only have honest reviews from real users.

Select Your Test Bundle

Excellent

  
200 reviews


Select Quantity

Buy one or SAVE BIG with a Multi Test Value Pack for the DHA Radiotherapy Technologist exam.

Bonus: 100 free flashcards for DHA Radiotherapy Technologist with purchase of at least 10 practice tests!
All transactions
secured and encrypted
All prices are
in US dollars
Get 10% OFF today's order using promo code SAVE-GYUY Ends in    


DHA Radiotherapy Technologist (DHA-RAD) Shortcuts

Additional test information
General Exam Info
Features
Features
Study Plan
Study Plan Tips
Exam Edge Desc
Test Reviews
Why Exam
Why Exam Edge?
Exam FAQ
FAQ
Exam FAQ
Take a FREE Test

DHA Radiotherapy Technologist - Reviews


   Excellent
Based on 200 reviews

Shafana


"Hi ma'am thank you so much I cleared my dha exam and this time the question papers helped me a lot. I ll surely recommend dha prep to all my friends thanks once again."

Roxan


   TrustPilot Review

"Very helpful and quick response."



See Why Our Users from 154 Countries Love Us!

Exam Edge is an industry leader in online test prep. We work with institutional partners to offer a wide array of practice tests that will help you prepare for your big exam. No matter how niche your field of interest might be, we are here to help you prepare for test day.



See why our users from 154 countries love us for their exam prep! Including 200 reviews for the DHA Radiotherapy Technologist exam.

Exam Edge is an industry leader in online test prep. We work with institutional partners to offer a wide array of practice tests that will help you prepare for your big exam. No matter how niche your field of interest might be, we're here to help you prepare for test day.

   Excellent -- Based on 200 reviews

2.7M+

Users

4M+

Tests Taken

100K+

Unique Tests

18

Years In Business



DHA Radiotherapy Technologist - Test Reviews Sample Questions

Which of the following is considered a rule of evidence, not of substantive law?

Correct Answer:
res ipsa loquitor.


the question asks which of the options listed is considered a rule of evidence rather than a rule of substantive law. to address this, it's important to understand the distinction between rules of evidence and rules of substantive law. substantive law defines the rights and duties of the people in their everyday dealings with each other, including both civil and criminal laws. on the other hand, rules of evidence are used to determine what evidence is admissible in court, focusing on the presentation and effects of legal evidence during litigation.

the first option, "res ipsa loquitur," is a legal doctrine that deals with the admissibility and implications of evidence in negligence cases. the term means "the thing speaks for itself" and applies in situations where the cause of an accident or injury is not known, but it is an accident that would not normally happen without negligence. it shifts the burden of proof from the plaintiff to the defendant, implying that the evidence of the accident itself suggests an act of negligence. this principle is primarily concerned with how facts are treated in the court and is, therefore, a rule of evidence.

the second option, "foreseeability," pertains to substantive law, specifically in the context of negligence and duty of care. it assesses whether a person should reasonably foresee the potential consequences of their actions or omissions. this concept helps in determining liability and is a core component of establishing negligence in the substantive law.

the third option, "respondeat superior," is a legal doctrine in substantive law that holds an employer or principal legally responsible for the wrongful acts of an employee or agent, if such acts occur within the scope of the employment or agency. this principle is central to many employment and tort law cases and concerns liability, not the admissibility of evidence.

finally, "personal liability" refers to the legal obligation of an individual to bear the financial costs of their actions. it is a fundamental concept in substantive law that holds individuals directly responsible for damages resulting from their actions, and it is unrelated to the procedural aspects of how evidence is treated or presented in court.

in summary, among the options provided, "res ipsa loquitur" is the only one that is considered a rule of evidence because it directly pertains to how evidence is interpreted and used in legal proceedings, specifically in negligence cases. the other three options relate to substantive law, dealing with liability and legal responsibilities rather than procedural evidence handling.

If informed consent is not given and tests and procedures are performed, what is this known as?

Correct Answer:
battery.


the correct answer to the question is "battery." when informed consent is not given and medical tests or procedures are performed anyway, it constitutes battery in the legal sense. battery, in this context, refers to any unauthorized or non-consensual touching or physical contact. in the medical field, this means any procedure or test performed on a patient without their informed consent is considered a violation of their bodily integrity and autonomy.

informed consent is a foundational principle in both medical ethics and legal requirements, emphasizing the patient's right to make informed decisions about their own body and medical treatment. it involves providing the patient with comprehensive information regarding the nature, benefits, risks, and alternatives to the proposed medical intervention, enabling them to make a well-informed decision about whether to proceed.

failure to obtain informed consent before performing a medical procedure or test can lead to legal actions against the healthcare provider or institution for battery. this not only breaches legal standards but also ethical norms respecting patient autonomy and the moral duty of care expected in healthcare settings.

it is important to differentiate battery from other legal terms such as "abuse" or "res ipsa loquitur." abuse typically involves a pattern of behavior that harms or endangers the well-being of another individual, which can be physical, emotional, or sexual in nature. res ipsa loquitur, a latin phrase meaning "the thing speaks for itself," is a legal doctrine used in tort law that infers negligence through the mere fact that a particular injury occurred, assuming that such accidents do not happen without negligent behavior.

in summary, when informed consent is not obtained, and a medical procedure is carried out, it is legally classified as battery. understanding and respecting informed consent is crucial for protecting patient rights and maintaining trust in the healthcare system.