This is the content of the pop-over!
  •    15% OFF today's order with promo code Teacher15   



ILTS Political Science (117) Practice Tests & Test Prep by Exam Edge - Review



** Sample images, content may not apply to your exam **


Passing your ILTS Political Science can be a very stressful time in your life. So why take chances with your preparation? Let us help you through the certification process. See why so many users choose ExamEdge.com to guide them through the process. We only have honest reviews from real users.

Not ready to purchase our complete practice tests yet? Start with a ILTS Social Science Political Science FREE Practice Test first!

Excellent

  

Select Quantity

Buy one or save big with a Multi Test Value Pack for the ILTS Political Science exam.

All transactions
secured and encrypted
All prices are
in US dollars
Get Instant Online Access Now!


Additional test information
Back To General Exam Info

ILTS Social Science Political Science - Reviews


   Excellent
Based on 140 reviews

Alistair


"Dear Exam Edge, I recently ordered a five pack of tests and successfully passed the ILTS Mathematics content area test with a score of 280/300. I found your tests a very effective way of testing my knowledge of the content material on the real test and seeing explanations of do problem. I scored between 265 and 285 on the practice tests and I felt confident taking the real test on the computer. I would highly recommend your practice tests to prospective teachers taking the ILTS Mathematics content test."

dwaina


   TrustPilot Review

"Navigating this site is excellent. Thank you"

Arnita


   TrustPilot Review

"The practice test were EXACTLY what i needed! The test explanations for answers were the teaching points i needed to help understand certain subjects. Thank you for your help!"

Sean


   TrustPilot Review

"These practice exams really put my mind at ease! I feel confident about taking my test when the current situation is over. EDIT: Yep. Nailed it."

Shamai


"I used Exam Edge to help me pass my Science 4-8 TExES exam on my first try! The practice exams look exactly how the real test looked and the timer helped me be a little less nervous. Now I’m using their practice exams to help me prepare to take my Science 7-12 TExES exam. Wish me luck! :)"

Jugoslav


"These are great exams to help prepare you for the exams. I passed my ILTS Learning Behavior Specialist I (155) exam on the first attempt. The question structure readily prepares you for how the structure will be on the test, multiple choice questions that are relevant to what is needed to know for the exam. I passed on the first attempt and I couldn't be happier with the results. Thank you!!! :)"

Steve


"I took the Integrated Social Studies OAE exam once and didn't pass after trying a few different programs to help me study for the test. Then I purchased the Exam Edge practice tests and after taking 12 practice tests I gave the OAE exam another shot. And to my surprise I passed the exam! Thank you for your support and providing this program"



See Why Our Users from 154 Countries Love Us!

Exam Edge is an industry leader in online test prep. We work with institutional partners to offer a wide array of practice tests that will help you prepare for your big exam. No matter how niche your field of interest might be, we are here to help you prepare for test day.



See why our users from 154 countries love us for their exam prep! Including 140 reviews for the ILTS Political Science exam.

Exam Edge is an industry leader in online test prep. We work with institutional partners to offer a wide array of practice tests that will help you prepare for your big exam. No matter how niche your field of interest might be, we're here to help you prepare for test day.

   Excellent -- Based on 140 reviews

2.7M+

Users

4M+

Tests Taken

100K+

Unique Tests

18

Years In Business




ILTS Social Science Political Science - Test Reviews Sample Questions

The landmark 2010 Supreme Court decision holding that the First Amendment prohibits government from censoring political broadcasts in candidate elections when those broadcasts are funded by corporations or unions is which of the following?





Correct Answer:
citizens united v. federal election commission
tizens united v. federal election commission.

the case of citizens united v. federal election commission is a significant ruling by the united states supreme court that reshaped the landscape of political campaigning and funding in america. this decision, handed down in 2010, fundamentally altered the way corporations and unions can spend money in political elections. prior to this decision, there were stringent regulations that limited the ability of corporations and unions to fund broadcasts that could influence elections, primarily due to concerns about the overwhelming influence of wealth in electoral politics.

the core issue in citizens united arose when a conservative nonprofit organization, citizens united, produced a critical film about hillary clinton, who was then a candidate for the democratic presidential nomination. the organization intended to distribute the film during the 2008 primary elections. however, this action was challenged based on the provisions of the bipartisan campaign reform act (bcra) of 2002, also known as the mccain-feingold act. according to bcra, "electioneering communications" funded by corporations or unions were prohibited from being broadcast within 30 days of a primary election or 60 days of a general election.

the supreme court's decision in citizens united overturned these limitations. the majority opinion, written by justice anthony kennedy, argued that the first amendment's guarantee of free speech extends to corporations and unions. the court held that the government does not have the right to ban free speech through the limitation of independent political broadcasts funded by organizations, irrespective of their corporate or union status. the ruling emphasized that political speech is indispensable to a democracy, which cannot be deprived of protection simply because the source of the speech is a corporation or union.

this decision has led to significant political and social implications, particularly concerning the increase in the amount of money spent on political campaigns and the rise of super pacs (political action committees). these organizations can raise and spend unlimited amounts of money to influence elections, provided they do not coordinate directly with candidates or political parties. critics argue that this leads to undue influence over elected officials and erodes democratic processes, while supporters claim it strengthens the right to free speech and broadens political participation.

in conclusion, citizens united v. federal election commission marked a pivotal shift in the regulation of political campaign financing, reinforcing the complex interplay between free speech, political funding, and democratic governance. the ruling remains a contentious aspect of political and legal debates concerning the balance between free expression and the integrity of democratic elections.