This is the content of the pop-over!
  •    15% OFF today's order with promo code Teacher15   



NYSTCE CST ESOL (116) Practice Tests & Test Prep by Exam Edge - Topics



** Sample images, content may not apply to your exam **

Understanding what is on the NYSTCE CST ESOL exam is crucial step in preparing for the exam. You will need to have an understanding of the testing domain (topics covered) to be sure you are studying the correct information.

  • Directs your study efforts toward the most relevant areas.
  • Ensures efficient and adequate preparation.
  • Helps identify strengths and weaknesses.
  • Allows for a focused approach to address gaps in understanding.
  • Aligns your preparation with the exam's expectations.
  • Increases the likelihood of success.
  • Keeps you informed about your field's current demands and standards.
There is no doubt that this is a strategic step in achieving certification and advancing your career.

Not ready to purchase our complete practice tests yet? Start with a NYSTCE CST English to Speakers of Other Languages FREE Practice Test first!

Excellent

  

Select Quantity

Buy one or save big with a Multi Test Value Pack for the NYSTCE CST ESOL exam.

All transactions
secured and encrypted
All prices are
in US dollars
Get Instant Online Access Now!


Additional test information
Back To General Exam Info

Understanding the exact breakdown of the NYSTCE CST English to Speakers of Other Languages test will help you know what to expect and how to most effectively prepare. The NYSTCE CST English to Speakers of Other Languages has 90 multiple-choice questions and 1 essay questions. The exam will be broken down into the sections below:

NYSTCE CST English to Speakers of Other Languages Exam Blueprint
Domain Name % Number of
Questions
Foundations of ESOL Instruction 28% 25
Developing English Language Proficiency Across the Curriculum 34% 31
The ESOL Program 28% 25
Developing English Language Proficiency Across the Curriculum: 10% 9


NYSTCE CST English to Speakers of Other Languages - Exam Topics Sample Questions

An elementary-school ELL student received some very low scores on a series of in-class math assessments but scored much better on the state standardized math test.  What is the best explanation for this discrepancy?





Correct Answer:
the in-class math tests involved a lot of reading


the most plausible explanation for the discrepancy in scores between the in-class math assessments and the state standardized math test for an elementary-school ell (english language learner) student is that the in-class math tests involved a significant amount of reading.

in many classroom settings, math tests are not solely about numbers and formulas; they often include word problems or instructions that require proficient reading skills to interpret. for ell students, who are still acquiring language proficiency in english, this can pose a major challenge. complex word problems or instructions that native english speakers find straightforward might be confusing or completely misunderstood by ell students, not because they lack mathematical ability, but because they do not fully understand the language in which the questions are written.

on the other hand, state standardized tests often have accommodations for ell students, such as simplified english, glossaries, or even translations, depending on the state's regulations and the student's needs. these accommodations are designed to measure the student's knowledge and skills in the subject matter, rather than their proficiency in english. as a result, ell students may perform better on these standardized tests because the language barrier is reduced, allowing them to demonstrate their actual competencies in mathematics more accurately.

therefore, when there is a significant discrepancy in performance between classroom assessments and standardized tests for an ell student, educators should first examine the language demands of their classroom assessments. it's crucial to ensure that the assessments are measuring the intended skills and knowledge rather than inadvertently testing english language proficiency. adjustments such as reducing the linguistic complexity of math problems or providing language support could help provide a more accurate measure of an ell student's math abilities.