This is the content of the pop-over!



AICPA FAR (FAR) Practice Tests & Test Prep by Exam Edge - Topics


Get Instant Online Access Now!

** Sample images, content may not apply to your exam **

Understanding what is on the AICPA FAR exam is crucial step in preparing for the exam. You will need to have an understanding of the testing domain (topics covered) to be sure you are studying the correct information.

  • Directs your study efforts toward the most relevant areas.
  • Ensures efficient and adequate preparation.
  • Helps identify strengths and weaknesses.
  • Allows for a focused approach to address gaps in understanding.
  • Aligns your preparation with the exam's expectations.
  • Increases the likelihood of success.
  • Keeps you informed about your field's current demands and standards.
There is no doubt that this is a strategic step in achieving certification and advancing your career.

Not ready to purchase our complete practice tests yet? Start with a AICPA Financial Accounting and Reporting FREE Practice Test first!

Select Your Test Bundle

Excellent

  

Select Quantity

Buy one or SAVE BIG with a Multi Test Value Pack for the AICPA FAR exam.

Bonus: 100 free flashcards for AICPA Financial Accounting and Reporting with purchase of at least 5 practice tests!
All transactions
secured and encrypted
All prices are
in US dollars
Get 10% OFF today's order using promo code SAVE-GYUY Ends in    


AICPA FAR (FAR) Shortcuts

Additional test information
General Exam Info
Exam Topics
Exam Topics
Features
Features
Study Plan
Study Plan Tips
Exam Edge Desc
Test Reviews
Why Exam
Why Exam Edge?
Exam FAQ
FAQ
Exam FAQ
FREE Practice Test


Understanding the exact breakdown of the AICPA Financial Accounting and Reporting test will help you know what to expect and how to most effectively prepare. The AICPA Financial Accounting and Reporting has 66 multiple-choice questions The exam will be broken down into the sections below:

AICPA Financial Accounting and Reporting Exam Blueprint
Domain Name % Number of
Questions
Conceptual Framework, Standard-Setting and Financial Reporting 25-35% 21
Select Financial Statement Accounts 30-40% 25
Select Transactions 20-30% 17
State and Local Governments 5-15% 4


AICPA Financial Accounting and Reporting - Exam Topics Sample Questions

Which of the following is an implicit representation when issuing the auditor's report on comparative financial statements under US auditing standards?





Correct Answer:
consistent application of accounting principles


the question asks which option represents an implicit representation in the context of issuing an auditor's report on comparative financial statements under us auditing standards. to understand this, it's crucial to grasp the distinction between explicit and implicit representations in an auditor's report.

an explicit representation in an auditor's report is something directly stated or clearly expressed in the text of the report. for example, the auditor's responsibility to obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence is typically explicitly stated in the report, as indicated by the standard language often included: "we believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion." this statement leaves no room for inference or assumption since the auditor is directly addressing the sufficiency and appropriateness of the audit evidence.

on the other hand, an implicit representation refers to information that is not directly stated but is implied or understood from what is explicitly stated. in the context of auditing comparative financial statements, the consistent application of accounting principles is an example of an implicit representation. this is because the auditor’s report does not typically mention the consistency in applying accounting principles unless there is a deviation or inconsistency that needs to be reported. therefore, when an auditor’s report does not raise any concerns about consistency, it is implicitly understood that accounting principles have been applied consistently over the periods in question.

in other options provided: - inadequate disclosure, if present, would need to be explicitly mentioned by the auditor in their report. - an accounting principle change that the auditor does not agree with would also be explicitly disclosed, either in the basis for modification paragraph or elsewhere in the report.

thus, the correct answer to the question is the "consistent application of accounting principles." this concept is not usually directly stated in the auditor's report but is implied unless otherwise mentioned due to inconsistencies or changes that affect the comparability of the financial statements. the lack of mention of any inconsistency thus implicitly communicates that accounting principles have been consistently applied, aligning with the expectations set by us generally accepted auditing standards (gaas).

Examples of circumstances in which related-party transactions may occur include all of the following except:





Correct Answer:
pessimistic earning forecast
related-party transactions are financial dealings that occur between entities that are considered to have a pre-existing relationship, often raising the issue of potential conflicts of interest or the need for enhanced disclosure. understanding the typical circumstances that might prompt such transactions can help in identifying and managing them effectively. here, we explore various scenarios where related-party transactions are likely to occur, with a focus on why a pessimistic earning forecast is not typically among these scenarios.

lack of sufficient working capital or credit to continue the business is a common reason for related-party transactions. when a company faces cash flow problems or cannot secure financing from external sources, it may turn to related parties such as major shareholders or parent companies for loans or financial support. this internal financing can provide necessary resources but must be scrutinized for fairness and market conformity.

dependence on a single or relatively few products, customers, or transactions can also lead to related-party transactions. companies in such situations may engage with related parties to diversify risk or to guarantee revenue through contracts or purchases that help stabilize operations. this is particularly common in industries where business volumes can be highly volatile or concentrated among few clients.

a declining industry might prompt companies to engage in transactions with related entities as a strategy for survival or consolidation. for example, companies might transfer assets to a related party with a stronger financial position or merge operations to maintain competitiveness and manage industry-wide challenges more effectively.

other scenarios that can lead to related-party transactions include excess capacity, where companies might utilize related parties to offload surplus production; significant litigation, where entities may seek financial help or asset protection strategies with related companies; and significant obsolescence, where related-party transactions can help manage or mitigate the impacts of outdated technology or products.

conversely, a pessimistic earning forecast does not typically lead to related-party transactions. pessimistic forecasts generally indicate expected declines in revenue or profitability, leading to cost-cutting measures, scaling back operations, or strategic reassessments. in such cases, transactions with related parties are not a direct or natural response. instead, an overly optimistic earning forecast might result in related-party transactions, where companies may engage in aggressive expansion or investment strategies supported by financial transfers or guarantees from related entities, often driven by a desire to capitalize quickly on perceived opportunities.

in summary, while related-party transactions can arise in various challenging or strategic scenarios, a pessimistic earning forecast, unlike an optimistic one, does not inherently create conditions that necessitate or encourage such transactions. instead, it typically leads to more conservative approaches focused on internal adjustments rather than external financial engagements with related parties.