This is the content of the pop-over!





AICPA FAR (FAR) Practice Tests & Test Prep by Exam Edge - Free Test


Our free AICPA Financial Accounting and Reporting (FAR) Practice Test was created by experienced educators who designed them to align with the official American Institute of Certified Public Accountants content guidelines. They were built to accurately mirror the real exam's structure, coverage of topics, difficulty, and types of questions.

Upon completing your free practice test, it will be instantly reviewed to give you an idea of your score and potential performance on the actual test. Carefully study your feedback to each question to assess whether your responses were correct or incorrect. This is an effective way to highlight your strengths and weaknesses across different content areas, guiding you on where to concentrate your study efforts for improvement on future tests. Our detailed explanations will provide the information you need to enhance your understanding of the exam content and help you build your knowledge base leading you to better test results.

Login or Create an Account to take a free test

After you have completed your free test you will receive a special promo code that will save your between 10-15% on any additional practice tests!


** Sample images, content may not apply to your exam **


Additional test information
Back To General Exam Info

AICPA Financial Accounting and Reporting - Free Test Sample Questions

Limitation of the net present value method and the internal rate of return include which of the following?





Correct Answer:
they rely on the forecasting of future data
the limitation of the net present value (npv) method and the internal rate of return (irr) method primarily concerns their dependency on the forecasting of future cash flows. this dependency introduces significant uncertainty and risk, which can be problematic for several reasons:

firstly, both npv and irr methods require estimates of future cash inflows and outflows. these estimates are inherently uncertain and can be influenced by numerous unpredictable external factors such as economic changes, market conditions, and technological advancements. the longer the project's duration, the greater the uncertainty, as it becomes more challenging to predict events far into the future accurately.

another issue with relying on forecasts is the quality and reliability of the data used. the accuracy of the npv and irr results is directly tied to the accuracy of the input data. incorrect or overly optimistic cash flow projections can lead to wrong investment decisions, potentially resulting in financial losses. this reliance on speculative data makes both methods less reliable, especially in volatile or rapidly changing industries.

it is also important to note that both npv and irr methods focus primarily on financial returns and do not inherently account for non-financial factors such as environmental impact, social repercussions, or strategic importance of a project. this can lead to a skewed perspective where financially lucrative projects are favored, potentially at the cost of broader organizational goals or ethical considerations.

while the npv and irr methods do consider the time value of money — recognizing that money today is worth more than the same amount in the future — this is generally seen as an advantage rather than a limitation. the time value of money is a critical concept in finance that helps ensure that future cash flows are appropriately discounted to reflect their lesser value in present terms. however, the rate used for discounting future cash flows in the npv method or the calculation of returns in the irr method can itself be subject to uncertainty and variability, adding another layer of complexity to these models.

in conclusion, the main limitation of the npv and irr methods lies in their dependence on forecasting future data. this reliance introduces significant risks and uncertainties, making these tools less effective in environments where future conditions are highly unpredictable. while these methods are valuable for their incorporation of the time value of money, their effectiveness is contingent on the accuracy and reliability of the underlying cash flow projections.