This is the content of the pop-over!
  
Exam Edge Dark Logo Exam Edge Dark Logo
Business
Healthcare
Education
World


Recent Searches
Try searching for

APA FPC Test Prep & Practice Questions - Review



** Sample images, content may not apply to your exam **


Passing your APA Fundamental Payroll Certification can be a very stressful time in your life. So why take chances with your preparation? Let us help you through the certification process. See why so many users choose ExamEdge.com to guide them through the process. We only have honest reviews from real users.

Not ready to purchase our complete practice tests yet? Start with a APA Fundamental Payroll Certification (FPC) FREE Practice Test first!

Excellent

  
160 reviews


Select Quantity

Buy one or save big with a Multi Test Value Pack for the APA Fundamental Payroll Certification exam.

All transactions
secured and encrypted
All prices are
in US dollars
Get Instant Online Access Now!

Additional test information
Back To General Exam Info

APA Fundamental Payroll Certification (FPC) - Reviews


   Excellent
Based on 160 reviews


See Why Our Users from 154 Countries Love Us!

Exam Edge is an industry leader in online test prep. We work with institutional partners to offer a wide array of practice tests that will help you prepare for your big exam. No matter how niche your field of interest might be, we are here to help you prepare for test day.



See why our users from 154 countries love us for their exam prep! Including 160 reviews for the APA Fundamental Payroll Certification exam.

Exam Edge is an industry leader in online test prep. We work with institutional partners to offer a wide array of practice tests that will help you prepare for your big exam. No matter how niche your field of interest might be, we're here to help you prepare for test day.

   Excellent -- Based on 160 reviews

2.7M+

Users

4M+

Tests Taken

100K+

Unique Tests

18

Years In Business



APA Fundamental Payroll Certification (FPC) - Test Reviews Sample Questions

Which of the steps listed below is not part of the determination of materiality before an audit?

Correct Answer:
request the previous benchmark used in prior audits.
to answer the question regarding which step is not part of the determination of materiality before an audit, it is important to understand the concept of materiality and its implications in the audit process.

materiality is a fundamental concept in auditing that refers to the significance of an amount, transaction, or discrepancy that would influence the decisions of a reasonable person relying on the financial statements. the determination of what constitutes materiality is a matter of professional judgment and is pivotal in planning and performing an audit.

the primary steps involved in determining materiality for an audit include: 1. **choosing an appropriate benchmark**: this could be a percentage of profit before tax, total revenue, total assets, or equity, depending on the nature of the client's business and operational characteristics. this step is crucial as it sets a base against which materiality is measured. 2. **determining the level of materiality using the chosen benchmark**: this involves deciding on a percentage or a specific amount that reflects the importance of financial information to stakeholders' decision-making processes. 3. **documenting the reasoning/justification for choices made**: this includes explaining why the chosen benchmark and the level of materiality are appropriate for this particular audit context. this documentation ensures transparency and facilitates the understanding of audit decisions by those who review the audit work, such as audit committees or regulatory bodies.

the step that is not part of determining materiality before an audit is "request the previous benchmark used in prior audits." relying solely on benchmarks used in previous audits without considering current financial and operational circumstances could lead to inappropriate or outdated conclusions about materiality. each audit is unique, and while historical benchmarks can provide insight, they should not dictate the materiality decisions for a current audit without a thorough and current analysis. financial conditions, business environment, and risks can change significantly, implying that what was material in a prior period might not be material in the current period.

thus, while auditors might review previous benchmarks as part of their overall understanding of the company's financial reporting context, it is incorrect to consider this as a formal step in the determination of materiality for the current audit period. the focus should always be on current conditions and the needs of the financial statement users at that time.